State of Oklahoma laws most pertinent

Message To President-Elect Obama: After Heller, “Build A Bridge To Moderates” With Common Sense On Guns

May 20th, 2012


Washington, D.C. (Vocus) November 21, 2008

Brady Campaign President Paul Helmke released the following statement today, cross-posted on the Brady Blog and on Huffington Post:

“Earlier this week we released the results of a poll on the gun issue, taken by the prominent Penn, Schoen & Berland firm, of 1,083 confirmed Election Day voters. Before discussing the responses that may come as a surprise to some, I wanted to highlight the analysis of Rob Green, a principal at PSB, who evaluated the new political status of gun violence prevention after this election:


“These findings suggest that sensible gun legislation provides a unique opportunity for the new Administration to build a bridge to moderate voters in both parties. It is no longer plausible for opponents of gun legislation to assert that gun laws will somehow lead to a total gun ban.”

“In fact, these results show that voters support a variety of basic safeguards for the public safety when it comes to keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people.”

“This support is strong in every region of the country, among voters who own guns and those who do not, across partisan and ideological lines — and even in the ‘New Blue’ states (states that George W. Bush won 2004 but that voted for Barack Obama in 2008). These ‘New Blue’ states are a cross-section of America, including Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.”

”First consider the poll’s general findings:

76% of all voters ”support the passage of laws placing reasonable restrictions on guns”; 78% of ”New Blue” state respondents support reasonable gun restrictions; 66% of gun owning voters also agree;
79% of all voters say the views of the NRA were not important to their vote for President; 78% of ”New Blue” state respondents agreed; 74% of gun owning voters agreed.

“Now, compare these results with voter attitudes on a few specific gun control policies:

83% of all voters favor criminal background checks for all gun sales; 87% of ”New Blue” state respondents favor them; 84% of gun owning voters favor them (virtually identical with voters overall);
68% of all voters favor the registration of gun sales and licensing of gun owners; 70% of ”New Blue” state respondents favor registration and licensing; even 60% of gun owning voters favor registration and licensing;
65% of all voters favor a waiting period of five days for handgun sales; 73% of ”New Blue” state respondents favor a waiting period; 64% of gun owning voters favor this waiting period;
65% of all voters favor banning military style assault weapons: 68% of ”New Blue” state respondents favor banning them; 60% of gun owning voters favor an assault weapons ban.
54% of all voters favor limiting the number of guns that can be bought at one time: 57% of ”New Blue” state respondents favor such limits; just 42% of gun owning voters favor these limits, however.

“What explains this strong, across-the-board, support for policies once considered controversial?”

“Perhaps the Supreme Court decision last June that Americans have an individual right to own a gun for self defense in the home, but that other reasonable restrictions are ‘presumptively lawful’ helped lay the groundwork here. Law-abiding citizens’ guns are safe. This position is consistent with those taken by candidate Barack Obama, as well as the Brady Campaign post-Heller. Because of the Supreme Court decision, the gun violence prevention debate has shifted from the extremes to the middle.”

“We saw in this election that candidates who favor sensible gun laws won across the country, while those favored by the National Rifle Association lost races at all levels across the country to Brady-endorsed candidates.”

“These results indicate that we may be experiencing a sea-change in the politics of gun violence prevention. Rather than driving a wedge between voters, common sense gun laws may instead help elected officials find a sensible middle ground that protects American families and communities while gaining the support of most voting groups.”

“After so many years of division, that would be a welcome change, indeed.”

Contact:

Doug Pennington

202-898-0792

dpenn at bradymail dot org

# # #







Related New Mexico Criminal Laws Press Releases

Is this warrant even legal?

May 20th, 2012

Question by tigerlily24: Is this warrant even legal?
I found out today that a warrant has been issued for me because when I was 16 I got a speeding ticket, and I apparently (I have no actual recollection of the event) sent in $ 25, presumably because that is all I had. When I looked it up on website for Oklahoma, it showed that I still owed $ 85 on that ticket. Now, that ticket happened 16 years ago. I have gotten a new license, and even been pulled over twice in Oklahoma in the last year (no tickets those times, thank god). No warrants. Then, last week, 16 years later, a warrant was suddenly issued out of nowhere, along with a $ 250 fine. The state record shows they only made one attempt to contact me in the interim in 1998. I never received their letter, as I and my parents had all moved out of state by then.

This so does not seem right; I would gladly pay them the $ 85 that I owed, but $ 250 seems unreasonable. Why now? Why would they wait this long to attempt collection? So I have any recourse? It seems like there should be some sort of statute of limitations, or that the fact this charge is from when I was a minor would nullify the situation by now.
It did show on the record I looked at online that I could have appeared to set up payment. At 9am on a Tuesday. I am pretty sure that at 16 I was legally required to be in school. (the ticket was also not in my hometown, so it would have been a drive for me to even get there). As a minor, I had few options, nor did I really know how these things worked. I probably thought that since I heard nothing else about it, that the $ 25 I mailed in took care of it. (After all, no traffic ticket I have ever received has ever had an amount owed on it.)

I also know that I got stiffed on a freelance job I did about 5 years ago, and when I tried to collect the money that was owed me, I was told that too much time had passed and that debts could not be collected after that much time.

Best answer:

Answer by Who aren’t you?
Just because they forgot to issue the warrant years ago doesn’t make it invalid now. You should have paid the whole fine back then, if you weren’t able, you should have gone to the courthouse and worked out some arrangement with them, you could probably have made payments. Now you suffer because of your actions.

85 dollars plus late fees for 16 years is reasonable at 250 bucks. You should just take care of that before it causes you MORE trouble.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

how old do you have be to ride a moped/motorcycle in oklahoma?

May 19th, 2012

Question by ethan y: how old do you have be to ride a moped/motorcycle in oklahoma?
i was skatingboarding with a friend yesterday and he said you could drive a moped by the age 14 and i want to know if thats true cus if it is i want to get one.

Best answer:

Answer by David N
Just wait till you’re 18, kid.

Give your answer to this question below!

What do you think of all these Organizations, Officials React to Federal Lawsuit?

May 18th, 2012

Question by THE GREATEST GODDESS JILL: What do you think of all these Organizations, Officials React to Federal Lawsuit?
Here you’ll find comments by advocacy groups, elected officials and others regarding the U.S. Department of Justice’s filing of a lawsuit challenging Arizona’s immigration enforcement law.

Read Senate Bill 1070 »

Read the Justice Department’s lawsuit »

——————————————————————————–

“As a direct result of failed and inconsistent federal enforcement, Arizona is under attack from violent Mexican drug and immigrant smuggling cartels. Now, Arizona is under attack in federal court from President Obama and his Department of Justice.” — Gov. Jan Brewer.

“Arizonans are understandably frustrated with illegal immigration, and the federal government has a responsibility to comprehensively address those concerns. But diverting federal resources away from dangerous aliens such as terrorism suspects and aliens with criminal records will impact the entire country’s safety. ” — U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

“The Obama Administration has not done everything it can do to protect the people of Arizona from the violence and crime illegal immigration brings to our state. Until it does, the federal government should not be suing Arizona on the grounds that immigration enforcement is solely a federal responsibility.” — U.S. Sens. Jon Kyl and John McCain, R-Ariz.

“It is disappointing to see the federal government choosing to intervene in a state statute instead of working with Arizona to create sustainable solutions to the illegal immigration issue that our state and country so desperately need.” — Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard.

“Gov. Jan Brewer cannot be permitted to pervert federal policy priorities and obstruct national progress all in the name of political pandering.” — Thomas A. Saenz, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund president and general council.

“It’s just so outrageous. it’s just an absolute insult to the rule of law.” — Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, the legislation’s chief sponsor.

“Arizona’s new law will likely spawn a patchwork of new immigration laws around the country. This isn’t an optimal approach. However, the response cannot be a patchwork of federal challenges — it needs to be comprehensive immigration reform.” — U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.

“The impact of illegal immigration on Arizona’s well-being cannot be denied. But to require local police to act as immigration agents when a lack of local resources already makes enforcing criminal laws and ordinances a challenging proposition, is not realistic. ” — Tucson Police Chief Roberto Villasenor.

“This lawsuit is a sideshow, distracting us from the real task at hand. ” — U.S. Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz.

“Mexico expresses its approval of the decision by the United States government to seek to block the implementation of the SB1070 law. The Mexican government repeats that it recognizes the sovereign right of all countries to adopt laws and public policies within their territories. But when a measure like SB1070 potentially affects the civil and human rights of thousands of Mexicans, the Mexican government has an obligation to protect the rights and dignity of its compatriots.” — Mexico’s Foreign Relations Department.

” Our country needs a federal solution to this problem, not a chaotic hodgepodge of 50 different state immigration policies.” — U.S. Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., Congressional Hispanic Caucus chairwoman.

“For President Obama to stand in the way of a state which has taken action to stand up for its citizens against this daily threat of violence and fear is disgraceful and a betrayal of his Constitutional obligation to protect our citizens. ” — U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ranking minority member.

“This is exactly the right time for our federal government to send a message about the importance of fairness and equality under the law.” — U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz.

“While the president acknowledged last week that Arizonans are justifiably fed up with inaction, filing a lawsuit is counterproductive to his statements of appealing to the American people’s highest ideals to create a sensible and workable immigration policy. Arizonans are tired of the grandstanding. Political posturing on this issue has to end.” — U.S. Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz.

“The administration’s lawsuit is a cannon shot across the bow of other states that may be tempted to follow Arizona’s misguided approach. “— Lucas Guttentag, ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project director.

“If the president wants to make real progress on this issue, he can do so by taking amnesty off the table and focus his efforts on border and interior security.” — U.S. Sen. Mitchell McConnell, R-Ky., S

Best answer:

Answer by jackie
Now that Obama is getting a La Raza member appointed to the supreme court he feels he can win letting all the illegals into the country. I just don’t understand why we are fighting in other countries for democracy while loosing ours. When will the military wake up and protect this country?

Give your answer to this question below!

Q&A: Motorcycle license in Oklahoma?

May 17th, 2012

Question by Lonewolf9844: Motorcycle license in Oklahoma?
If you already have an Oklahoma drivers license, what all do you have to do to get your motorcycle endorsement? I’ve checked the DMV site and it didn’t give a clear answer.

Please only answer if you’ve got experience.
If you’re just some ass-wipe trying to get points, buzz off.

Best answer:

Answer by Firecracker .
Seems pretty clear to me.
Go take a written test and an eye exam. Request a learner’s permit.
Find someone licensed and over 21 to supervise you.
Go take the practical test. Remember that you must prove insurance on the motorcycle you bring to the test.

OR

Take the MSF course.
Bring the certificate with your other ID.
Receive a license.

http://www.dps.state.ok.us/dls/apply/dl_mendorsement.html

MSF courses in OK: http://nm.msf-usa.org/msf/ridercourses.aspx?state=OK

What do you think? Answer below!

MINI Cooper, Keystone Chevrolet- Sand Springs, OK 74063

May 14th, 2012

MINI Cooper, Keystone Chevrolet- www.keystonechevrolet.com imagine driving this Astro Black Metallic 2007 MINI Cooper,equipped with a 4 Cyl. engine and a 6 speed manual transmission with only 31947 miles. enjoy an exceptional 34 miles to the gallon on this great car with features like GPS Navigation System, Leather Upholstery, Leatherette Upholstery, Remote Keyless Entry, AM Stereo Radio, Tilt Steering Wheel, Cruise Control, and much more. Enjoy the drive and have peace of mind in this 2007 MINI Cooper. see us at Keystone Chevrolet today! miles- 31947 vin- WMWMF73577TL84915 Keystone Chevrolet 8700 Charles Page Blvd. Sand Springs, Oklahoma 74063 phone:877-895-9512 www.keystonechevrolet.com
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Q&A: Can someone please explain to me what exactly a sovereign state is?

May 13th, 2012
oklahoma state government
by SS&SS

Question by blair.: Can someone please explain to me what exactly a sovereign state is?
I live in Oklahoma and I know it is a sovereign state. I am just a little confused on what it means. Does the national government not have any power over Oklahoma anymore?

Best answer:

Answer by cakes
A sovereign state (commonly simply referred to as a state) is a political association with effective internal and external sovereignty over a geographic area and population which is not dependent on, or subject to any other power or state.[1] While in abstract terms a sovereign state can exist without being recognised by other sovereign states, unrecognised states will often find it hard to exercise full treaty-making powers and engage in diplomatic relations with other sovereign states. For a list of all 203 states, see the List of sovereign states page.

Add your own answer in the comments!

child custody laws in oklahoma?

May 12th, 2012

Question by Starr6_6: child custody laws in oklahoma?
Me and my ex were never married and have a 5 year old son. He has been living with me since he was 2 when we split up. my son was going up to see his dad via grandparents (because dad wouldnt drive 100 miles to get him), now after months of verbal abuse from his dad, i am trying to file for legal custody. When my son went to see his dad, he spent more time with his grandparents because his dad was too busy or too tired to spend time with him. When he would come home, his dad wouldnt call for over a week and finally call after i called his mother and she called and told him too! He is currently living with a women (which i really dont care about) but, this woman has called the police on him multiple times trying to kick him out, thrown him out with out calling the cops, lied about her ex husband (who murdered someone ). His father couldnt even handle him for more than 4 hours without help from his mother because my son has ADHD and a slight developmental delay (hes a handful). My sons dads grandparents arent the most together people either, they have had many domestic disputes invloving the police, and leaving my son with an uncle who drank so much and passed out and my son was wondering the streets!
My ex called today saying he has some kind of paperwork saying that he has to have contact with his son or i will go to jail? is there such a thing? I have no problem with dad coming down here for visitation. But i do not want him around this woman who wont even meet with me, because me and my sons dad had a sexual relationship 5 years ago! (and shes 37!) any advice????

Best answer:

Answer by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥
Find a Lawyer and document everything you have said here.

Give your answer to this question below!

what’s on the driving test in tulsa Oklahoma?

May 11th, 2012

Question by General Greivous: what’s on the driving test in tulsa Oklahoma?
give specific items and maneuvers plz.

Best answer:

Answer by Ted H
How to Pass the Oklahoma Driving Test

http://www.ehow.com/how_2043220_pass-oklahoma-driving-test.html

Copy of the manual

http://www.dps.state.ok.us/dls/pub/ODM.pdf

Give your answer to this question below!

How old do you have to be to get your drivers license in Oklahoma?

May 11th, 2012

Question by : How old do you have to be to get your drivers license in Oklahoma?
I have heard if you were born after 1997 that you can’t get it until your 18. Is this true? I would really like to get it at 16 vs 18… I was born in 97 :(

Best answer:

Answer by Jennifer
After reading about on the net I can’t see anything about a law changing the age.
So 16 I presume. You can apply for your learner permit at 15 1/2 years old If you are worried about it still, perhaps go to your nearest DMV and ask there. :) Good luck!

What do you think? Answer below!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers